Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96062 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 19:38:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 19:38:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 88721 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:38:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 88394 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:38:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ws.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 88385 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 19:38:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:38:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.49] (HELO mail-qw0-f49.google.com) (209.85.216.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:38:32 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so1844033qwh.22 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:38:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7hUa1x52G4pqGg2/v4BWtinpMysxcesVoCHnN161qtQ=; b=SUwYvtmBX17lxo96Yi/nznLWAaAyt5N1LTtsC6Kf6p0PAsE/XuYmUxIGR8rZDFvHE4 jUd447f4GXgZknd9kjBrJWRg8BQ2yec2Nl3mLdnewOVAyVqXD5Zdq4jTizTOuRgIiJKk UNFS0rg6KJwbFDkQs8GJ/2MEx0bCnpgdlsL0E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=oND96ytpg5oXkEXbrw9uaJX93Yho152qjYrXyHFK77FQgXG8OaEPf848Lno3ogKtFm 9U1HGR+XxWOqlDFtfpnj3VvONlCetuAuqy+ppiozaAFI9GheBLQLazR2FBZHNpiQteT2 9qxKSFBAWExU0+0Y9+vaiWR1gkHyvwqssOkFM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.229.18 with SMTP id jg18mr4135942qcb.156.1288035491783; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.246.2 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:38:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:38:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JaxMe to the (virtual) attic? From: Jochen Wiedmann To: dev@ws.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It's sad for me to say, but there's really nothing else to do. +1 On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Folks, > > It's been observed that JaxMe is very quiet. Should we plan to give it > the same treatment as WSIF and MUSE? > > --benson > -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)