ws-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glen Daniels <g...@thoughtcraft.com>
Subject Re: JaxMe to the (virtual) attic?
Date Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:29:16 GMT
Benson is entirely correct, but somehow forgot to add "Moo ha ha" to the end
of his message.

On 10/25/2010 4:25 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Demetris <demetris@ece.neu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> I am afraid to ask but ... define "treatment" or "attic-ing" ...
> 
> To tell you the truth, we're not exactly sure. The ASF has an Attic
> policy for use when an entire TLP closes up shop. Various things go
> read-only and into the custody of the Attic PMC.
> 
> However, these 'WS' components are not TLPs. So we have yet to
> determine whether they go to the Official Foundation Attic with the
> mad uncles and aunts, or whether we do some similar things under our
> own control here.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> On 10/25/2010 1:48 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>> It is the season for creepy.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Glen Daniels<glen@thoughtcraft.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/25/2010 1:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's been observed that JaxMe is very quiet. Should we plan to give it
>>>>> the same treatment as WSIF and MUSE?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it's just the season, but I can't help but hear that in a vaguely
>>>> creepy tone of voice... "the treatment", eh? :)
>>>>
>>>> But +1 to "attic-ing" it.
>>>>
>>>> (note to self - still need to send that mail to the attic team asking
>>>> about
>>>> subproject etiquette)
>>>>
>>>> --Glen
>>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message