Mailing-List: contact general-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
To: <general@ws.apache.org>
Subject: Re: What's next for =?UTF-8?Q?WS=40Apache=3F=20Discuss=2E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:28:09 -0400
From: Glen Daniels <glen@thoughtcraft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BC68321.7050603@thoughtcraft.com>
References: <4BC68321.7050603@thoughtcraft.com>
Message-ID: <eeff0f2fff3d58badea32aea04b5afb3@localhost>
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8


Hm, mostly crickets chirping.

Should we just Attic everything then? :)

--G

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:08:17 -0400, Glen Daniels <glen@thoughtcraft.com>
wrote:
> Hey y'all,
> 
> So as per my earlier mail to the dev lists, we need to talk about...
> 
> * Which subprojects should be promoted to TLPs?
> * Which subprojects should be migrated to the Attic?
> * What should the structure look like for what remains?
> 
> Here's what we've got to work with.
> 
> 1. Axiom (commons)
> 2. Neethi (commons)
> 3. XmlSchema (commons)
> 4. Tcpmon (commons)
> 5. Guththila (commons)
> 6. JaxMe
> 7. jUDDI
> 8. Scout
> 9. Muse
> 10.Woden
> 11.WSIF
> 12.WSS4J
> 13.XMLRPC
> 
> Let's talk Attic first.  It seems WSIF and Muse have been pretty much
> inactive for some time now, so I'd propose we get the ball rolling with
> proposals to Attic both of those.  JaxMe also seems ripe for the Attic.
> 
> I think that it's pretty clear jUDDI and Scout should migrate together
to a
> new TLP, Apache jUDDI, with Kurt as chair.  Thoughts?
> 
> Does anyone outside of Axis2/C use Guththila?  If not, I'd suggest that
> migrate to Axis.
> 
> Is there enough activity on XMLRPC to keep it alive?  Jochen?
> 
> Personally, I'd probably prefer to leave Axiom, Neethi, XmlSchema, and
> Tcpmon
> as subprojects of WS.  I'd like to get rid of the "commons" layer,
though,
> since I think the "new" WS project should itself be a set of commonly
> useful
> WS components.  I know other ideas have been discussed for the commons
> stuff,
> so let's start that discussion and get the various opinions out on the
> table?
> 
> That leaves Woden and WSS4J.  Maybe Woden should stay in WS?  As for
WSS4J,
> I'm not sure if it should stay or become a TLP.
> 
> So... what do you guys think?
> 
> Thanks,
> --Glen
> 
> P.S.  Reminder - please fill out your sections of our board report for
this
> month if appropriate!