Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24530 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2008 17:58:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2008 17:58:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 57452 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2008 17:58:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-general-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 56908 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2008 17:58:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: general@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list general@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 56886 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2008 17:58:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:58:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates 216.239.58.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.239.58.190] (HELO gv-out-0910.google.com) (216.239.58.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:57:04 +0000 Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c6so407618gvd.22 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:57:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=6eseDqJmEYKw9aZWtyyiKxeUNf6ObX3yvMUn0v596cA=; b=xrKWrBijM/qGZEmXHYbDzspWA99DZ5bb/776kTLyVnh5Bm38lDrOB/oj6sLBHephrL 8S8NU2eQzMosO0q86xB8OlfhahggRF1qK0vunwlVSmQbHOIxF6zr1FkZkdmUBAZQBqOB OMtWKnr7T5Xx2WAhkg3HWrxpAVuN6mdItHr38= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=BjlAZHs4/CotNDeO8kkrDy40WvfLmG4ecpoXERUe0u/ZDbhhISAl3ez9zYxv9TMKXr mB+nEYRDIE3BgK5Dehlig4zmc3vREzP32uwJ8XaBqGYm3oms/3608V93csB99H6ntWO2 4r0bYy9LsemBOwhd2w4dqhNo2KtrqwMZTgK1M= Received: by 10.181.224.6 with SMTP id b6mr2235175bkr.187.1225216624487; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.181.4.18 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19e0530f0810281057g104f2adcr339bfe9e3304c524@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:57:04 -0400 From: "Davanum Srinivas" To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Axis2 as TLP Cc: general@ws.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49074205.8090006@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <19e0530f0810261629w59dd1c1bm61a18aa343763a40@mail.gmail.com> <4906A730.2050809@opensource.lk> <19e0530f0810280849g5a86f262g31307634a1234c88@mail.gmail.com> <49074205.8090006@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Deepal, yep, not taking care of them is what i meant. Yep, i totally understand day-to-day work. thanks, dims On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Deepal jayasinghe wrote: > >> One reason is that they have found that a small focused PMC/committer >> set takes better care of the code, web site, releases, legal issues >> and basic oversight of day to day workings of a PMC better than a huge >> umbrella PMC. For example, personally i think Synapse has thrived >> after it left the fold. >> > I have to agree with Dims here , because at the moment WS is a very big > project with a number of sub-projects. > And WS consists of three main project as well , which is Apache SOAP , > Axis1 and Axis2. > Specially Axis1 and Axis2 has a number of sub projects as well. So > managing them efficient manner is a challenging job , > and specially for the PMC chair it is lot of work. Therefore it is > always a good idea to modularize them. >> Take a look at our web site(s), take a look at our release >> schedules(s) - for all projects, take a look at our bug tracker(s). >> Does anyone see that we are doing an excellent job? >> > I am sorry I do not understand what do you mean by bug tracker , is that > the problem of number of issues > or is it a problem of we are not taking care of them ? >> We need to gather momentum, going TLP is an excellent way to do that. >> A small focused team that is working on a single goal of getting a >> good set of Axis2 related projects going is i think the right way to >> go. I think the Axis2 eco system will do better when we go TLP. >> > :) >> Personally, I'd really like to get all of us committed, willing and >> able to contribute in a much more coordinated fashion then we are >> today. We don't hang out on IRC, no weekly chats, not much forward >> looking discussions, not much enthusiasm or cooperation anymore from >> looking at the mailing lists. I am trying to see if we can jumpstart >> that as well with this proposal. >> > Well part of the reason behind that is everyone is busy with their day > to day work , > for example when we start Axis2 we were fully focus on Axis2 . > So it was so easy for us to do all those , but now we work on Axis2 and > answer the mail > when we get some free time. Anyway I agree that there are some > improvements that we need to do. > > > Thanks > Deepal >> fwiw, Juddi and xmlrpc do not have sufficient people on board to go >> TLP as of this moment. Yes, we should try harder to get more people >> involved there or we end up moth-balling them. >> >> thanks, >> dims >> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana >> wrote: >> >>> I'm -1 because the Axis2 project is not just axis2- its a collection of >>> enabling pieces (axiom, neethi at least) and a bunch of up stream components >>> (rampart, sandesha2, kandula2, wss4j etc.). So its really the "web services" >>> project with an entire ws-* framework being covered by that. Calling the >>> whole thing axis2 is not right as its not just about axis2. >>> >>> I would like to clearly identify components within the ws project that are >>> retired or "finished". These include (from what I know) scout, wsif, axis1, >>> jaxme, kandula1, and sandesha1. However, as Nadra's message shows, there are >>> parts of the "axis1 family" still alive and kicking. >>> >>> There are other projects that I think do not use axis1 or axis2 - for >>> example juddi & xmlrpc - that I think could go TLP on their own to reduce >>> the size of ws. >>> >>> So I'm -1. >>> >>> However, Glen, what was the motivation for originating that thread? Is there >>> something broken that needs to be fixed? IIRC Dims was always against >>> splitting when he was PMC chair and I'd like to hear the reason for and >>> against by both Glen and Dims too. >>> >>> Sanjiva. >>> >>> Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>> >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> There was a WS PMC thread which has not yet shown up here.... >>>> >>>> So, WDYT? Could we spin off Axis2 and related projects into a separate >>>> TLP? Pros / Cons / Thoughts welcome. >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> dims >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. >>> Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/ >>> Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ >>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ >>> Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/ >>> >>> Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/ >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Thank you! > > > http://blogs.deepal.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org > > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org