From general-return-4064-apmail-ws-general-archive=ws.apache.org@ws.apache.org Mon May 02 00:33:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68238 invoked from network); 2 May 2005 00:33:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2005 00:33:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 74545 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2005 00:34:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-general-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 74480 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2005 00:34:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: general@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list general@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 74467 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2005 00:34:40 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from web52106.mail.yahoo.com (HELO web52106.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.39.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Sun, 01 May 2005 17:34:40 -0700 Received: (qmail 95432 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2005 00:33:14 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=iwxxUExrpDNj6uYA1fyZGNfyzaOfbxUHxA22pDAI8WwpIQSYNMv56ZraONySSb7I+fuuuUEUxrNkiamCsdb4LPVhwrGFlQn/FMhiO1SSiYZmCooNI4sxhrqWghqEJCn/AJzKABO3A01Ep02rWyM1JKb9gKkTvjN32xIerloA2CY= ; Message-ID: <20050502003314.95430.qmail@web52106.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.173.159.44] by web52106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 01 May 2005 17:33:14 PDT Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Anil Saldhana Subject: Re: RFC: ws-commons To: general@ws.apache.org In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Xerces-J does not have StAX capability. AFAIK, the only open source impl of Stax is on codehaus (contributed by the designers of Stax). --- Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > Hi Anil, > > > What is the general opinion on using Xerces Schema > > Parser? > > http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/index.html > > > > I know that it does good schema to Java model and > not vice-versa. > > I have no opposition to it at all - the last time I > looked at it however > (which was a few years ago though) it was not very > good at being used > for data binding type stuff; it was designed > strictly for validation. > Has that changed? If so certainly worth looking at > it. > > Oh from an Axis2 point of view there's another > requirement .. we'd > really, *really*, like the schema parser to be > implemented using StAX. > Otherwise we'd need to have 2 parsers around :-(. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com