Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-addressing-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66932 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 13:19:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 13:19:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 41953 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2006 13:19:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-addressing-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 41900 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2006 13:19:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact addressing-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list addressing-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 41875 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2006 13:19:13 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:19:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.77.186.1] (HELO pscgate.progress.com) (192.77.186.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:19:10 -0800 Received: from mx1.progress.com (mx1 [192.77.186.16]) by pscgate.progress.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/PSC-5.11) with ESMTP id k0CDInPF001375 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:18:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from progress.com ([192.233.92.16]) by mx1.progress.com (MailFrontier 4.1.2.5941) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:19:56 -0500 Received: from NTEXFE02.bedford.progress.com (ntexfe02 [172.16.2.62]) by progress.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k0CDIiZ27166 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:18:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from MAIL01.bedford.progress.com ([172.16.2.57]) by NTEXFE02.bedford.progress.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:18:44 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Reference properties / params Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:18:40 -0500 Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B2701802BE8@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Reference properties / params Thread-Index: AcYXerRm46BJFFYRS/unu5wPZnZQpQ== From: "Glen Daniels" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2006 13:18:44.0777 (UTC) FILETIME=[B6D92190:01C6177A] X-Mlf-Version: 4.1.2.5941 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Addressers, It looks like currently we do this thing in AddressingHeaders.processReferenceProperty() (line 590 or so) where if we have a null list of refP Qnames that we're looking for, we mark ALL non-WSA headers as reference properties and process them all.... This seems like a remarkably bad thing. I'm going to remove this behavior (and only mark reference properties / parameters that are explicitly specified) unless someone objects. Is there some good reason for this? Thanks, --Glen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: addressing-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: addressing-dev-help@ws.apache.org