Mailing-List: contact wink-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luckbr1975@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6A434CA9-65EF-4BC4-BD7C-0AE07DEE13AD@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGU5spcK2qfYsnNoTUN_naZdX9Po-dPdPYyU1NbZ32CspXANgw@mail.gmail.com>
	<6A434CA9-65EF-4BC4-BD7C-0AE07DEE13AD@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:44:02 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAGU5spf8hZhK5mOv75vAjjg2WCWHPkvJ=xgdhjgnubc33GMY4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Incubator Board Report (February 2012)
From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
>> Please review Wink February's draft board report at :
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>
> Thanks Luciano! I have one comment regarding:
>
> "Top issues before graduation:
>
> * Getting more active dev community"
>
> I think the specific issue is about the diversity/size of the active dev community. Slightly different than a "more active" dev community. IMO, the core issue isn't necessarily the level of activity, but the diversity/size doing the dev...
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --kevan

What I was trying to mention is that, in the context of graduation, we
need "at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single
company or entity that is vital to the success of the project". We do
have it, but most of them became inactive last year. What you seem to
be saying is to don't count on those and only consider the active
committers as the dev community. Did I get it right ? Anyway, I'll
make the updates on the current report...

-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/