Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-wicket-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6670810E5E for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79684 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2014 20:14:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-users-archive@wicket.apache.org Received: (qmail 79651 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2014 20:14:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@wicket.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@wicket.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@wicket.apache.org Received: (qmail 79643 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2014 20:14:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:14:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.214.174] (HELO mail-ob0-f174.google.com) (209.85.214.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:14:24 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id va2so3329785obc.19 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:14:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VHLTIZxZTyBzh+4hSd4tbcfgmhAvyqRUTAMcJ3tFi68=; b=SU58frmyDqcgIPq/2cEnt47t+DZSAVwd7N913KbSVby6TcG88KbvKFs7E0b4s8I8UB pQXumM1GQMK2BG0SjdJ/O3hEW3tI+IGM2pREjytdbWNRuTETlk/9ULnhzGHpSPPxMZlU Tym8BfOOQ9srEIQghSDruF8Jxo33vHcaaCy3IuT7eUwH6TbpW6VmiDwUsWie0PnxfRvh r5BPkvx/GFgt1v9DbDIzTFW2H6ulr99/PivBonlBnqHEr+mabqkXvf7TstmexWoQpuLh C25nkhjxyrI1XBHImAfAGoHW0tHNhPk7lOt9edOqfEkBauOkfiUdIL6/PV8huTsyQixg DcLg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnFVBYlIcBwDgVKyyHJSNFvm7r7V3Wcw7ugVFkvR3WeBbea5LiDx9Q4qLGijVQ5w/h3qI4I MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.83.17 with SMTP id m17mr4090072oey.62.1389384842553; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.162.36 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:14:02 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [38.125.180.2] In-Reply-To: <1389369619526-4663618.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1389369619526-4663618.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:14:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ListenerInvocationNotAllowedException and EmptyRequestHandler From: Paul Bors To: "users@wicket.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011832d4ff45bf04efa35d0f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e011832d4ff45bf04efa35d0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Do you have a stack trace? On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:00 AM, jchappelle wrote: > We are starting to get ListenerInvocationNotAllowedExceptions > intermittently > in production. What are some suggestions for handling this? My first > thought > is return an EmptyRequestHandler in my custom IExceptionMapper > implementation. Is this a bad practice? > > Thanks for your time. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ListenerInvocationNotAllowedException-and-EmptyRequestHandler-tp4663618.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org > > --089e011832d4ff45bf04efa35d0f--