Return-Path: 
 <users-return-81636-apmail-wicket-users-archive=wicket.apache.org@wicket.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-wicket-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F7EC10896
	for <apmail-wicket-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Tue,  9 Jul 2013 18:15:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 86323 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2013 18:15:38 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-users-archive@wicket.apache.org
Received: (qmail 86305 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2013 18:15:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@wicket.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@wicket.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@wicket.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@wicket.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@wicket.apache.org
Received: (qmail 86293 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2013 18:15:36 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:15:36 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [173.229.255.125] (HELO omhq-meg-01.upcorp.uprr.com)
 (173.229.255.125)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:15:29 +0000
Received: from omhq16ca.uprr.com (eth0.omhq16ca.uprr.com [67.206.9.97]) by
 omhq-meg-01.upcorp.uprr.com with smtp
	 id 1283_0c71_f397821e_1d11_43f8_80f2_33fd2ae5fc29;
	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:17:16 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by omhq16ca.uprr.com (postfix) with ESMTP id D4AFF2803A
	for <users@wicket.apache.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2013 13:15:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from uprrn2.www.uprr.com (en01.omhq528c.uprr.com [69.58.249.40])
	by omhq16ca.uprr.com (postfix) with ESMTP
	for <users@wicket.apache.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2013 13:15:06 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJeg+AVbgb7AT4xihksu88yahJZxRDWhEyUF+LrOcJWbiVkXQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: FormComponent independent from the Model/Model object
Message-ID: 
 <OF99059145.528E6023-ON86257BA3.006410B5-86257BA3.006442C4@LocalDomain>
From: "Richard W. Adams" <RWADAMS1@UP.COM>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:15:07 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="=_alternative 006442C086257BA3_="
References: 
 <CAJeg+AVbgb7AT4xihksu88yahJZxRDWhEyUF+LrOcJWbiVkXQA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 99059145:528E6023-86257BA3:006410B5; name=$KeepSent; type=4
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.2FP4 November 18, 2011
X-Disclaimed: 49183
X-EMSProtect: 0
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--=_alternative 006442C086257BA3_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well, one approach is create it as a normal HTML control & not render it=20
via Wicket. You can just attach a standard Javascript event (such as=20
onclick) to get the behavior you want.

Bottom line: You don't have to "Wicketize" everything on your page. Just=20
because you have a hammer, it doesn't mean everything is a nail.




From:   Dmitriy Neretin <dmitriy.neretin@googlemail.com>
To:     users@wicket.apache.org
Date:   07/09/2013 12:58 PM
Subject:        FormComponent independent from the Model/Model object



Hi everyone,

I have a dummy question:

If I have a panel with a form (not everything is my code) ->

public class MyPanel{

  public MyPanel(id, IModel<MyObj> model){
        super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel<MyObj>(model);
        ....
        Form<MyObj> form =3D new Form("id", model);
        form.add(new AjaxCheckBox("anyStupidId");
        add(form);

     }

}

And I want to add a Component (AjaxCheckBox) to the form above, but this
component shouldn't have anything to do with a model object. It's purpose
is just a change the state of the input fields. If I check the box the
field should be deactivated and vice versa. Nothing more.

My problem is, that Wicket thinks (and I even know  why :)) the
"anyStupidId" is a field of MyObj and tries to change the value... Well,
the checkbox should be inside of the form, but I don't know if is it
possible to make this checkbox independent from the Model handling... How
can I tell wicket, "hey dude, anyStupidId has nothing to do with MyObj, it
is really just a stupid id"

Regards,
Dmitriy



**

This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential=
 and/or privileged for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any use, re=
view, disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance by others, and any forw=
arding of this email or its contents, without the express permission of the=
 sender is strictly prohibited by law.  If you are not the intended recipie=
nt, please contact the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and destroy al=
l copies.
**

--=_alternative 006442C086257BA3_=--