wicket-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benedikt Schlegel <codecab.dri...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: format value missing in ConversionException thrown by wicket-datetime's DateConverter
Date Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:21:18 GMT
Ok, so they won't get merged any time soon. Maybe in about 2 years, if
we're lucky :-(

But still, is it possible to make some smaller enhancements on those until
we finally get Java 8?


2012/11/6 Jesse Long <jpl@unknown.za.net>

> Hi Benedikt,
>
> wicket-datetime implementation is much nicer, but requires the Joda Time
> dependency, which the wicket-extensions version is based on normal JDK API.
>
> When JSR310 comes out in Wicket's minimum required Java version (Java 8?)
> we can probably merge them.
>
> Cheers,
> Jesse
>
>
> On 05/11/2012 13:40, Benedikt Schlegel wrote:
>
>> What I need is not what I want in this case.. I want to reuse wicket
>> components as much as possible. I don't want to reinvent the wheel.
>>
>> In wicket, there are two separate, Date-specific TextField components:
>> - org.apache.wicket.extensions.**markup.html.form.DateTextField
>> - org.apache.wicket.datetime.**markup.html.form.DateTextField
>>
>> Both use different DateConverters, to be located at:
>> - org.apache.wicket.util.**convert.converter.**DateConverter
>> - org.apache.wicket.datetime.**DateConverter
>>
>> The components in wicket-datetime are more convenient and powerful, so I'm
>> gonna use them. The only drawback I see is the spartanic
>> ConversionException, in which e.g. the dateformat information is missing.
>> The exception created by wicket-etensions's DateConverter holds that
>> information. So yes, I guess this is a break.
>>
>>
>> That also raises a much bigger question: Why is that legacy code (my
>> guess)
>> in wicket-extensions still there? Why don't consolidate those two? As I
>> see
>> it, same authors were working on both packages?
>>
>>
>> 2012/11/5 Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org>
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> We follow users@ mailing list too :-)
>>>
>>> Since
>>> 1) DateConverter is not final
>>> 2) the related methods in it are public, non-final
>>> 3) it is possible to register custom converter for Date.class in
>>> ConverterLocator
>>>
>>> I think you should be able to do what you need.
>>> Are there any breaks ?
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Simon B <simon.botting@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Benedikt
>>>>
>>>> Should this be posted on the "Forum for Wicket Core developers" forum?
>>>>
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>
>>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.**n4.nabble.com/format-value-**missing-in-*
>>> *ConversionException-thrown-by-**wicket-datetime-s-**DateConverter-**
>>> tp4653598p4653603.html<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/format-value-missing-in-ConversionException-thrown-by-wicket-datetime-s-DateConverter-tp4653598p4653603.html>
>>>
>>>> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>> ---------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org<users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> jWeekend
>>> Training, Consulting, Development
>>> http://jWeekend.com
>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>> ---------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org<users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org<users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message