wicket-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From vineet semwal <vineetsemwa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Centralizing ajax inline javascript
Date Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:04:21 GMT
assuming you are using a repeater say dataview/gridview,think about
that in this way 200*200==40k items of repeater,are you rendering that
number of items at once?
i would have used a small table with navigator or some ajax scroll behavior ..

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:11 PM, lukuperman <lukuperman@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all, I am working on an application that was built with Wicket 1.4.15.
> It has to show a table with an AjaxCheckBox on each cell. Most of the final
> html size is because of the inline ajax behavior on each cb (ie 20Mb for a
> 200x200 table). Leaving aside the fact of rendering big tables (which is
> imposed by business), can you give me some hints or ideas on how can I
> decrease final html size maintaining ajax behavior? For example, how can I:
>
> -centralize the javascript and make checkboxes call it passing the minimum
> parameters needed (id, etc)
> -or event registration, without migrating to Wicket 6 (not allowed to)
> -some other way?
>
> Thank you!
> Lucas
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Centralizing-ajax-inline-javascript-tp4652499.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>



-- 
regards,

Vineet Semwal

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Mime
View raw message