Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-13262-apmail-wicket-dev-archive=wicket.apache.org@wicket.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89655 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2011 03:40:10 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2011 03:40:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 8702 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2011 03:40:10 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-dev-archive@wicket.apache.org
Received: (qmail 8653 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2011 03:40:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@wicket.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@wicket.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@wicket.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.wicket.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@wicket.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@wicket.apache.org
Received: (qmail 8645 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2011 03:40:07 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 03:40:07 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of igor.vaynberg@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.210.173] (HELO mail-iy0-f173.google.com)
 (209.85.210.173)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 03:40:01 +0000
Received: by iye19 with SMTP id 19so19537681iye.32
        for <dev@wicket.apache.org>; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 19:39:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=QzbXvCAUK/gjCy80pQUzSgrsDTeeTljyufrkS/qZLZA=;
        b=PVbVyxgg8tZoRHDB2G9kKBlkguWD+MMHs8jNsmSp2uZd74spCLWvi8kzOGP5zBSWAt
         xoT+cL0jewAcagppllDWzJnfx5tY+9fl6FX0gkzUkyJ+6hhavBzhMBexQlpQ/4/riGUj
         0NwtPK5kar3dbKK9R/zPZQpq3lQvl6GzfAF84=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=ShENxFigHSeFY9+Cm4QHpMlA+OT0BW9h691AdT+2WI322Srr0aSd8UBAZpSOwL2LUo
         vROSUifC2qV82HwlJbOj0HWuqBLjtHmWsepIMwwkD1oDv3MdABe8fy99N/kkummyFWvI
         /1t72CxIRDzsggsmNGkHt0BSOE3hCRji3AWTs=
Received: by 10.231.17.77 with SMTP id r13mr12126763iba.38.1294630780590; Sun,
 09 Jan 2011 19:39:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.181.213 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Jan 2011 19:39:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 19:39:20 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=t+BCYB8Uk7kOTX+kjQf3AJZVMD2=Axo5GBtRS@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: AbstractRequestWrapperFactory?
To: dev@wicket.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Since we provide AbstractRequestWrapperFactory shouldnt it be plugged
into wicketfilter somewhere? right now it seems a bit strange that it
and its friends are so isolated.

-igor