wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1033843 - in /wicket/trunk/wicket/src: main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/ main/java/org/apache/wicket/resource/ main/java/org/apache/wicket/resource/aggregation/ main/java/org/apache/wicket/resource/dependencies/ main/java/org/
Date Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:10:36 GMT
Hi Jeremy,

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson

> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jrthomerson@apache.org>wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org>wrote:
>>> Notice that I touched AjaxHeaderContributionPage2_ajax_expected.html and
>>> removed expected javascript header contribution after Ajax request.
>>> I think this is the proper fix because this JS url is already contributed
>>> by normal (non-Ajax) page load and it should not be redelivered later by
>>> Ajax contributions.
> So, the strange thing is that what makes this fail is that close() is now
> called after the component hierarchy traversal.  The fact that it was not
> being called before really seems like a bug.  But, closing it stops this
> contribution from being rendered because it is rendered after the header
> response is closed (and is therefore skipped).
> So, I have a couple questions:
>    1. First - is your statement above correct?  If I add a css file in the
>    page, and then contribute the same URL via AJAX, should it be added to the
>    page a second time?  You say no, but it appears that we've been testing to
>    make sure that it is.  I think there could be cases where it should - what
>    if that URL returns dynamic css (js, etc) that has changed since the page
>    was originally loaded?  It could be JSON, for instance, that has changed.
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.IHeaderResponse.wasRendered(Object) checks
whether something is already rendered.
Maybe my understanding is wrong and this method checks only for the current
wicket-ajax.js also does some filtering in that area but I have to re-check
the code before saying something.
The problem with reusing the same url for different request/responses is
that the browser (private cache) or public caches can decide to use the
cached response from previous request and thus the new JSON will never be
used. Unless there is 'random' parameter in the URL which will solve the
problem with #wasRendered().

About the test itself: for the Ajax request it returns "javascriptB". What
exactly is "B"?! Reading the test I cannot explain this right now.

>    1. Second - there's some strange order of operations happening here
>    that's causing this.  I am about to walk out the door and haven't had a
>    chance to fully investigate why this is happening.  I wonder why
>    AjaxHeaderContribution2 overrides renderHead(HtmlHeaderContainer
>    container) rather than implementing the normal IHeaderContributor
>    method.  Anybody know off the top of their head?
> Jeremy

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message