wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: line wrap length (Was: Re: svn commit: r1031086 [1/14] - in /wicket/trunk: ./ archetypes/quickstart/.settings/ testing/wicket-threadtest/.settings/ wicket-auth-roles/.settings/ wicket-datetime/.settings/ wicket-examples/.settings/ wicket-extensio
Date Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:35:20 GMT
I'd rather not go beyond 100, or if forced 120. Trying to stuff too
much into one line especially with nested ifs/fors/whiles is a really
big code smell. If you need 160 characters to read the whole code,
then refactor the code.

Martijn

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Erik van Oosten <e.vanoosten@grons.nl> wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Code is not only for the developers, as this is an open source project it is
> also read by many many other people that use Wicket. Not all of those
> developers have access to 23" screens. I am often stuck on a 17" screen,
> many colleagues use 2 17" screens. On such screens up to 120 characters is
> acceptable, 160 not.
>
> Regards,
>    Erik.
>
>
> Op 05-11-10 06:13, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>
>> While we're sort of discussing this, how would everyone feel about
>> increasing our line wrap length?  It's currently 100.  I always work on
>> widescreens (which even most laptops are now), and love having it closer
>> to
>> 160 (or 180, but that's a little much for many folks).
>>
>> How would everyone feel about 160?
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my SMTP compliant software
> Erik van Oosten
> http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
>
>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com

Mime
View raw message