wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [proposal] Replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson for building wicketstuff projects
Date Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:28:22 GMT
Here are the instructions for setting it up on linux/unix:

http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Installing+Hudson#InstallingHudson-Unix%2FLinuxInstallation

You *can* just do:

java -jar hudson.war

and it'll run.  That's just a quick way to get it up and running to
play around with it.

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Johan Compagner <jcompagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> how do you deploy then?
> has hudson its container (tomcat)??
> Then we also need another port. And have all kind of apache config to
> support things like:
>
> wicketstuff.org/hudson
>
> hmm that i dont like. It should just run on the tomcat instance we have.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:51, Martijn Dashorst
> <martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Security needs to be enabled and other stuff. Deploying as a war does
>> have some drawbacks: restarting using the UI won't work,
>> installing/updating plugins/new versions of hudson is enabled by
>> default.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Johan Compagner <jcompagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> hudson is just a war right?
>>> so that can be dumped by anybody of the wicket devs to onto the tomcat
>>> webapp dir.
>>>
>>> What more does hudson need?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:14, Martijn Dashorst
>>> <martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> My little bird told me that no build server is part of the new deal
>>>> which is slated to be announced mid-august, so IMO we should not delay
>>>> the migration off of teamcity and setup hudson. I'll contact the
>>>> sysadmin for the box to see if I can grant direct access, or that only
>>>> "trusted" folks are allowed.
>>>>
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Martijn Dashorst
>>>> <martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> There are some developments unfolding in the near future that might
>>>>> help out on the future of our wicketstuff server and/or its
>>>>> infrastructure. I don't have the full details to those plans yet, and
>>>>> don't know if they entail a build server of some sorts.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm perfectly happy with switching to hudson—we use it at work and
it
>>>>> has been a godsend compared to the other available solutions (though
I
>>>>> still don't like the UI).
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope we can wait a (couple of) week(s) and see the future plans
>>>>> unfold to see what the details are, especially with respect to a build
>>>>> server. I'll ask around to see if it is part of that deal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh
>>>>> <michael.ocleirigh@rivulet.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been using Hudson reliably to build wicketstuff core snapshot's
and
>>>>>> deploying them into the sonatype maven repository.  I put together
an older
>>>>>> machine for this purpose (P4 1.8Ghz) and while it worked at first
recently
>>>>>> there have been memory issues (at least one of the DDR1 DIMM's is
bad and
>>>>>> the JVM keeps crashing).   I have the builds running temporarily
somewhere
>>>>>> else but the long term solution is to run Hudson on a box that can
be opened
>>>>>> up to the other wicketstuff developers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My proposal is to replace TeamCity on wicketstuff.org with Hudson
and then
>>>>>> do the necessary setup to allow wicketstuff developers access to
it for
>>>>>> initiating builds and viewing the projects status.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am willing to do all of the necessary setup and configuration to
make this
>>>>>> happen; basically copying over what I have working right now plus
adding in
>>>>>> user authentication.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The easiest way would be if I could get a user account on the
>>>>>> wicketstuff.org server (at least initially) and then get everything
setup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are still some questions around if the wicketstuff.org box
is still
>>>>>> banned by sourceforge but I think the best way to find out the answer
is to
>>>>>> try and see what happens.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>>>>> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
>>>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>>>> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
>>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.8
>>
>

Mime
View raw message