Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51399 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2009 08:51:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2009 08:51:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 6987 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2009 08:51:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-dev-archive@wicket.apache.org Received: (qmail 6945 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2009 08:51:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@wicket.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@wicket.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@wicket.apache.org Received: (qmail 6935 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2009 08:51:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:51:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.208] (HELO mail-fx0-f208.google.com) (209.85.220.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:51:42 +0000 Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so1632622fxm.16 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:51:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.163.202 with SMTP id q10mr350109hbd.129.1254559881824; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:51:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <23eb48360910021528w65e89314u94ebc65c11e9e0df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:51:21 +0300 Message-ID: <303141550910030151h20fb8cc9vcd76eb5a61e70317@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: taking the I out of Interface From: Martin Makundi To: dev@wicket.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am also curious how much more difficult it will make to switch from 1.4 to 1.5. The cost of renaming according to some fasion might accumulate to millions of dollars in worldwide development teams. Just for the sake of some damn "another naming gimmic" which does not bring any real functionality (no value trade off for the money spent). ** Martin