Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37121 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2009 01:04:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2009 01:04:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 27735 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2009 01:04:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-wicket-dev-archive@wicket.apache.org Received: (qmail 27687 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2009 01:04:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@wicket.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@wicket.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@wicket.apache.org Received: (qmail 27677 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2009 01:04:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:04:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of igor.vaynberg@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.191] (HELO mail-yx0-f191.google.com) (209.85.210.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:04:03 +0000 Received: by yxe29 with SMTP id 29so580949yxe.14 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=W2ypn2nnmn20eC83a7+UM2js6W+G6A7ub4hqIRoW5z8=; b=rmWOJbq32b6KRvWLHbTI6Fg7uLgZaa03geFvNJ7k/zKtg/H//p8yYlhfPg3A1Qj55q ZBcaJckfP3odjzUP/S1/3YiGwHE3zd7o88PNXyRHscvx8g8LOFtUs9wGLo0S1Jz+LEIK Jnw+GDkfnRBKKeis3doPaWCbVvwx3cfJqGOLs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=XsH6SYf51Y6MIdQSpU1cEiJXu/w5WTpjwTxilUY18OxNW2d1VxmrJ7BGbOX6DOwwRe euVCGtVJhmhN4GvxQBot7LfQdDf1Rbe2x8TqAFoG/ZiQ4cuiq5myXc62f/cvWX5li6QD gtWNScZoTrSTDrMu6mV2d/BbZJQL8lRe/KRMo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.234.26 with SMTP id g26mr3653025anh.54.1254531822912; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:03:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <23eb48360910021528w65e89314u94ebc65c11e9e0df@mail.gmail.com> References: <23eb48360910021528w65e89314u94ebc65c11e9e0df@mail.gmail.com> From: Igor Vaynberg Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:03:22 -0700 Message-ID: <23eb48360910021803o60e962bay3d3be0f7db7b6244@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: taking the I out of Interface To: dev@wicket.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org for people who are going to say that this is going to break compatibility: please look through your code and count the number of places where you implement a wicket-specific interface directly. we would like to know how often and what these interfaces are. thanks, -igor On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket > has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this > convention, is it time for a change? > > this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh > aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch. > > -igor >