wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Altuğ B. Altıntaş <alt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: taking the I out of Interface
Date Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:29:34 GMT
what about upgrading projects from 1.4 to 1.5  ?
It breaks compatibility

-1

Not: i am not a *committer* but loves wicket :)

2009/10/3 Matej Knopp <matej.knopp@gmail.com>

> 1.5 is going to be neither source nor binary compatible. And I
> wouldn't say that consistency and conventions is not a reason.
>
> -Matej
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:14 AM, tetsuo <ronald.tetsuo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > -1
> >
> > It breaks compatibility for absolutely no reason.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Johan Edstrom <seijoed@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >> On Oct 2, 2009, at 17:28, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>  is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket
> >>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this
> >>> convention, is it time for a change?
> >>>
> >>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh
> >>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch.
> >>>
> >>> -igor
> >>>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Altuğ.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message