wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Gravener <r...@ryangravener.com>
Subject Re: taking the I out of Interface
Date Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:58:26 GMT
It's just my preference.  IModel / Model vs. Model / ObjectModel or
Model / ModelImpl

Ryan Gravener
http://bit.ly/no_word_docs



On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Matej Knopp <matej.knopp@gmail.com> wrote:
> Easier? How's that? I find it really annoying that when I'm looking
> for something and I have to know upfront whether it is an interface or
> a class. And when reading the code, what difference does it really
> make if it is interface or a class? By that logic we should start
> using hungarian notation. You could easily see what type the class
> member is...
>
> -Matej
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Ryan Gravener <ryan@ryangravener.com> wrote:
>> -1  It's nice to know what is an interface by seeing the I.  Also for
>> IDEs its easier to find the class I'm looking for.
>>
>>
>> Ryan Gravener
>> http://bit.ly/no_word_docs
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Matej Knopp <matej.knopp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Altuğ B. Altıntaş <altuga@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> what about upgrading projects from 1.4 to 1.5  ?
>>>> It breaks compatibility
>>> There will be other breaks. This is not a minor update. Breaks
>>> compatibility is hardly a valid argument here. We will break
>>> compatibility one way or another. But we will also provide migration
>>> path. Replacing Model with ObjectModel and then IModel with Model in
>>> code (just an made up example) is hardly a task that would prevent
>>> anyone from migrating application to 1.5.
>>>
>>> -Matej
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> Not: i am not a *committer* but loves wicket :)
>>>>
>>>> 2009/10/3 Matej Knopp <matej.knopp@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> 1.5 is going to be neither source nor binary compatible. And I
>>>>> wouldn't say that consistency and conventions is not a reason.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matej
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:14 AM, tetsuo <ronald.tetsuo@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> > -1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It breaks compatibility for absolutely no reason.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Johan Edstrom <seijoed@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> +1
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Oct 2, 2009, at 17:28, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>  is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names?
wicket
>>>>> >>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that
follows this
>>>>> >>> convention, is it time for a change?
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is
teh
>>>>> >>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should
switch.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> -igor
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Altuğ.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message