wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Johan Edstrom <j...@opennms.org>
Subject Re: taking the I out of Interface
Date Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:29:25 GMT
Oh, +42 on removing I, and +42 on removing *Impl

On Oct 2, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Matej Knopp wrote:

> I think that IFoo and Foo is every bit as bad as Foo and FooImpl. Both
> show rather poor choice of naming. Same goes for IModel and Model.
>
> -Matej
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Eelco Hillenius
> <eelco.hillenius@gmail.com> wrote:
>> -1
>>
>> Breaks compatibility for nothing other than a superficial
>> 'improvement'. Also, I do see the I used in other projects, and
>> actually like the convention (a whole lot better than using
>> AbstractFoo and Fooimpl fwiw).
>>
>> Eelco
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com 
>> > wrote:
>>> is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket
>>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows  
>>> this
>>> convention, is it time for a change?
>>>
>>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh
>>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch.
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>

Johan Edstrom

joed@opennms.org

They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary  
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759






Mime
View raw message