wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org>
Subject Re: [wicket 1.5] url handling refactor preview
Date Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:42:03 GMT
mad typos :-)

is not a "bug deal" but not a "big deal" *lol*


Am 07.10.2009 um 09:40 schrieb Peter Ertl:

> well, not a bug deal!
>
> /image/${fullnameIncludingExtension} can be parsed easily :-)
>
> Am 07.10.2009 um 02:14 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
>
>> erm, although we do not quiet support
>>
>> /${name}.${format}/ only a full path segment can be a placeholder  
>> for now.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com 
>> > wrote:
>>> svn up and see org.apache.wicket.request.mapper.mount
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Peter Ertl <pertl@gmx.org> wrote:
>>>> +1.000 for that
>>>>
>>>> mount RequestHandler will allow any kind of browser output  
>>>> (resources,
>>>> pages, server side redirects to external urls, etc.)
>>>>
>>>> being able to access placeholders from resources will be great :-)
>>>>
>>>> thinking of something like:
>>>>
>>>> mount(new MountedMapper("image/${name}.${format}",  
>>>> imageResourceHandler)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 06.10.2009 um 17:13 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
>>>>
>>>>> ahha, here is something we need to change. we should have a
>>>>> mountedmapper that allows one to mount a requesthandler rather  
>>>>> then a
>>>>> page. the user should not go as far as having to implement
>>>>> requestablepage, there are a lot of extraneous methods there if  
>>>>> all
>>>>> you want to do is handle the request yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> -igor
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Stoch <daniel.stoch@gmail.com

>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The great thing for me is that I'll be able to mounting  
>>>>>> something that
>>>>>> just implements RequestablePage interface, not only a Page class
>>>>>> descendants (if I've read this code correctly :)). It allows to 

>>>>>> handle
>>>>>> navigation more flexible and it allows to avoid creating hard to
>>>>>> maintain page class hierarchies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Am 07.10.2009 um 09:40 schrieb Peter Ertl:

> well, not a bug deal!
>
> /image/${fullnameIncludingExtension} can be parsed easily :-)
>
> Am 07.10.2009 um 02:14 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
>
>> erm, although we do not quiet support
>>
>> /${name}.${format}/ only a full path segment can be a placeholder  
>> for now.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com 
>> > wrote:
>>> svn up and see org.apache.wicket.request.mapper.mount
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Peter Ertl <pertl@gmx.org> wrote:
>>>> +1.000 for that
>>>>
>>>> mount RequestHandler will allow any kind of browser output  
>>>> (resources,
>>>> pages, server side redirects to external urls, etc.)
>>>>
>>>> being able to access placeholders from resources will be great :-)
>>>>
>>>> thinking of something like:
>>>>
>>>> mount(new MountedMapper("image/${name}.${format}",  
>>>> imageResourceHandler)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 06.10.2009 um 17:13 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
>>>>
>>>>> ahha, here is something we need to change. we should have a
>>>>> mountedmapper that allows one to mount a requesthandler rather  
>>>>> then a
>>>>> page. the user should not go as far as having to implement
>>>>> requestablepage, there are a lot of extraneous methods there if  
>>>>> all
>>>>> you want to do is handle the request yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> -igor
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Stoch <daniel.stoch@gmail.com

>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The great thing for me is that I'll be able to mounting  
>>>>>> something that
>>>>>> just implements RequestablePage interface, not only a Page class
>>>>>> descendants (if I've read this code correctly :)). It allows to 

>>>>>> handle
>>>>>> navigation more flexible and it allows to avoid creating hard to
>>>>>> maintain page class hierarchies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>


Mime
View raw message