wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com>
Subject Re: taking the I out of Interface
Date Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:04:33 GMT
-1 as well.  Since the vote seems to be nothing more than "I like it" or "I
don't like it"....  I like it.  I use it in my projects as well.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com



On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<eelco.hillenius@gmail.com>wrote:

> -1
>
> Breaks compatibility for nothing other than a superficial
> 'improvement'. Also, I do see the I used in other projects, and
> actually like the convention (a whole lot better than using
> AbstractFoo and Fooimpl fwiw).
>
> Eelco
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket
> > has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this
> > convention, is it time for a change?
> >
> > this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh
> > aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch.
> >
> > -igor
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message