wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: taking the I out of Interface
Date Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:47:15 GMT
oh, but we have a lot of Abstract* classes, some of them might even
have your name on it :)

-igor

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<eelco.hillenius@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1
>
> Breaks compatibility for nothing other than a superficial
> 'improvement'. Also, I do see the I used in other projects, and
> actually like the convention (a whole lot better than using
> AbstractFoo and Fooimpl fwiw).
>
> Eelco
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket
>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this
>> convention, is it time for a change?
>>
>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh
>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>

Mime
View raw message