wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: taking the I out of Interface
Date Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:00:05 GMT
thats what migration notes are for

most people do not use the I convention in their apps, so it is pretty
annoying for them to deal with this. and for those who do they are
already used to doing something different because they are using other
libs that do not use the convention.

-igor

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Altuğ B. Altıntaş <altuga@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also It brings extra learning curve process;  i thinks that's the major
> update
> IModel will be Model ? himm
>
> 2009/10/3 Matej Knopp <matej.knopp@gmail.com>
>
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Altuğ B. Altıntaş <altuga@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > what about upgrading projects from 1.4 to 1.5  ?
>> > It breaks compatibility
>> There will be other breaks. This is not a minor update. Breaks
>> compatibility is hardly a valid argument here. We will break
>> compatibility one way or another. But we will also provide migration
>> path. Replacing Model with ObjectModel and then IModel with Model in
>> code (just an made up example) is hardly a task that would prevent
>> anyone from migrating application to 1.5.
>>
>> -Matej
>>
>> >
>> > -1
>> >
>> > Not: i am not a *committer* but loves wicket :)
>> >
>> > 2009/10/3 Matej Knopp <matej.knopp@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> 1.5 is going to be neither source nor binary compatible. And I
>> >> wouldn't say that consistency and conventions is not a reason.
>> >>
>> >> -Matej
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:14 AM, tetsuo <ronald.tetsuo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > -1
>> >> >
>> >> > It breaks compatibility for absolutely no reason.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Johan Edstrom <seijoed@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> +1
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Oct 2, 2009, at 17:28, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names?
wicket
>> >> >>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows
>> this
>> >> >>> convention, is it time for a change?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh
>> >> >>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should
switch.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> -igor
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Altuğ.
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Altuğ.
>

Mime
View raw message