wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Grigorov <mcgreg...@e-card.bg>
Subject Re: taking the I out of Interface
Date Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:19:26 GMT
+1 for removing 'I'. I personally do like it but since this is what the
committers prefer than I'm fine.

-1 for renaming Model to anything else.
@Erik: it'd be interesting to be at a course of jWeekend where you'll
explain to the attendees "Wicket consists of components, models, ... and
the basic model is Locator (and all implementations end with **Model)".
I'll find it confusing. 
I hope Wicket 1.5 will not rename all existing Model implementations.

A side note: some third party projects already depends on 'I' classes.
For example Terracotta depends on IClusterable for its Wicket module.
Take this into account as well.

El dom, 04-10-2009 a las 13:55 +0200, Erik van Oosten escribió:
> I agree, the I is useless. Provided there is a good migration I'd say: +1.
> 
> I also agree with Martin, lets change IModel to Locator while we're at it!
> 
> Regards,
>      Erik.
> 
> 
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket
> > has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this
> > convention, is it time for a change?
> >
> > this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh
> > aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch.
> >
> > -igor
> >   
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message