wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matej Knopp <matej.kn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: taking the I out of Interface
Date Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:17:47 GMT
I think that IFoo and Foo is every bit as bad as Foo and FooImpl. Both
show rather poor choice of naming. Same goes for IModel and Model.


On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Eelco Hillenius
<eelco.hillenius@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1
> Breaks compatibility for nothing other than a superficial
> 'improvement'. Also, I do see the I used in other projects, and
> actually like the convention (a whole lot better than using
> AbstractFoo and Fooimpl fwiw).
> Eelco
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket
>> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this
>> convention, is it time for a change?
>> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh
>> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch.
>> -igor

View raw message