wicket-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan Sonnek" <ryan.son...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Build server - what do we do?
Date Sat, 03 May 2008 00:40:33 GMT
any thoughts on using hudson for the build server?

I overhauled my employer's build servers changing from bamboo to hudson
specifically because of memory constraints.  hudson is very lightweight and
worked great for us.

just my 2 cents.

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dashorst@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Status:
>
>  - build server: teamcity professional, is operational, will ask for
> an open source license if we decide to go with teamcity
>  - confluence: upgraded to 2.8, operational
>  - wicket examples (dojo, 12, 13, security, inmethod): operational
>  - teatime operational (##wicket logs)
>  - jira - not operational, doesn't want to start up, fails with
> classdef not found
>
> Before we open up the flood gates to all projects to setup team city,
> I'd like to get some opinions first.
>
> Since we currently have 20 or so accounts, I'd like to get some
> volunteers to setup a couple of projects and see how the server
> behaves with more projects.
>
> Martijn
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message