| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch |
Wed, 14 Mar, 23:39 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch |
Wed, 14 Mar, 23:39 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch |
Wed, 14 Mar, 23:44 |
| Frank Bille |
Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch |
Wed, 14 Mar, 23:51 |
| Al Maw |
Package rename heads-up for wicket-1.x branch |
Thu, 15 Mar, 00:31 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: Package rename heads-up for wicket-1.x branch |
Thu, 15 Mar, 00:34 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch |
Thu, 15 Mar, 02:22 |
| Frank Bille |
Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch |
Thu, 15 Mar, 07:19 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch |
Thu, 15 Mar, 07:46 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: svn commit: r518211 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/wicket/ajax/wicket-ajax.js |
Thu, 15 Mar, 07:51 |
| Martin Funk |
Possible collisions between Channels in wicket-ajax.js |
Thu, 15 Mar, 08:31 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Possible collisions between Channels in wicket-ajax.js |
Thu, 15 Mar, 09:30 |
| Gwyn Evans |
Re: Release 1.3 - status |
Thu, 15 Mar, 11:26 |
| Gwyn Evans |
Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch |
Thu, 15 Mar, 11:27 |
| Martin Funk |
Re: Possible collisions between Channels in wicket-ajax.js |
Thu, 15 Mar, 14:21 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Possible collisions between Channels in wicket-ajax.js |
Thu, 15 Mar, 14:42 |
| Martin Funk |
Re: Possible collisions between Channels in wicket-ajax.js |
Thu, 15 Mar, 15:04 |
| Jean-Baptiste Quenot |
Re: svn commit: r518211 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/wicket/ajax/wicket-ajax.js |
Fri, 16 Mar, 09:21 |
| Jean-Baptiste Quenot |
About forking 1.3.x to 1.4.x |
Fri, 16 Mar, 09:39 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: About forking 1.3.x to 1.4.x |
Fri, 16 Mar, 09:52 |
| Gwyn Evans |
Re: About forking 1.3.x to 1.4.x |
Fri, 16 Mar, 10:12 |
| Korbinian Bachl |
Wicket 1.3/ DropDown / too small for Jira? |
Fri, 16 Mar, 15:33 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: Wicket 1.3/ DropDown / too small for Jira? |
Fri, 16 Mar, 15:35 |
| Korbinian Bachl |
AW: Wicket 1.3/ DropDown / too small for Jira? |
Fri, 16 Mar, 15:40 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
PortletApplication versus WebApplication |
Sat, 17 Mar, 22:31 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: PortletApplication versus WebApplication |
Sat, 17 Mar, 22:39 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
State of the 1.3 release |
Sat, 17 Mar, 23:08 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: State of the 1.3 release |
Sat, 17 Mar, 23:11 |
| Frank Bille |
Re: State of the 1.3 release |
Sat, 17 Mar, 23:17 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
[poll] Future of portlets |
Sat, 17 Mar, 23:33 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: [poll] Future of portlets |
Sat, 17 Mar, 23:35 |
| Johan Compagner |
Re: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch |
Sat, 17 Mar, 23:42 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: [poll] Future of portlets |
Sun, 18 Mar, 00:07 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 00:36 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 00:49 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 00:51 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 01:06 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 01:49 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 02:53 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 04:53 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 06:32 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 09:49 |
| Janne Hietamäki |
Re: [poll] Future of portlets |
Sun, 18 Mar, 10:27 |
| Janne Hietamäki |
Re: PortletApplication versus WebApplication |
Sun, 18 Mar, 10:30 |
| Janne Hietamäki |
Re: PortletApplication versus WebApplication |
Sun, 18 Mar, 10:46 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: [poll] Future of portlets |
Sun, 18 Mar, 13:08 |
| Janne Hietamäki |
Re: [poll] Future of portlets |
Sun, 18 Mar, 13:11 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: svn commit: r519483 - /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/jdk-1.5/wicket-spring-annot/src/test/java/wicket/spring/injection/annot/AnnotProxyFieldValueFactoryTest.java |
Sun, 18 Mar, 16:56 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Wicket 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT kitchensink release is available |
Sun, 18 Mar, 18:10 |
| Jean-Baptiste Quenot |
format settings: don't format header comment (Re: svn commit: r519672 [1/2] - in /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x: jdk-1.4/wicket-datetime/.settings/ jdk-1.4/wicket-extensions/.settings/ jdk-1.5/wicket-auth-roles/.settings/ jdk-1.5/wicket-jmx/.settings/) |
Sun, 18 Mar, 21:06 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: format settings: don't format header comment (Re: svn commit: r519672 [1/2] - in /incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x: jdk-1.4/wicket-datetime/.settings/ jdk-1.4/wicket-extensions/.settings/ jdk-1.5/wicket-auth-roles/.settings/ jdk-1.5/wicket-jm |
Sun, 18 Mar, 21:29 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
modal window & custom serialization throw exception |
Sun, 18 Mar, 21:43 |
| Gwyn Evans |
Re: Wicket 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT kitchensink release is available |
Sun, 18 Mar, 22:26 |
| Ryan Holmes |
Re: generics in Wicket |
Sun, 18 Mar, 23:52 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: generics in Wicket |
Mon, 19 Mar, 00:43 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: generics in Wicket |
Mon, 19 Mar, 01:35 |
| Ryan Holmes |
Re: generics in Wicket |
Mon, 19 Mar, 03:58 |
| Ryan Holmes |
Re: generics in Wicket |
Mon, 19 Mar, 05:22 |
| Eelco Hillenius |
Re: generics in Wicket |
Mon, 19 Mar, 07:58 |
| Johan Compagner |
Re: generics in Wicket |
Mon, 19 Mar, 08:18 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
This marks the end for trunk (was: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch) |
Mon, 19 Mar, 09:36 |
| Vincent Demay |
Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 11:29 |
| Johan Compagner |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 13:10 |
| Johan Compagner |
Re: This marks the end for trunk (was: VOTE: New roadmap and desicion on the future of Wicket 2.0 branch) |
Mon, 19 Mar, 13:12 |
| Vincent Demay |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 13:27 |
| Johan Compagner |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 13:28 |
| Vincent Demay |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 13:34 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 13:40 |
| Vincent Demay |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 13:53 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:07 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:13 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:19 |
| Vincent Demay |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:27 |
| Johan Compagner |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:33 |
| Frédéric Bertin |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:37 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:37 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:42 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:44 |
| Johan Compagner |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:46 |
| Frédéric Bertin |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:50 |
| Vincent Demay |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:52 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 14:59 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 15:03 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 15:10 |
| Vincent Demay |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 15:16 |
| Frédéric Bertin |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 15:19 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 15:22 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 15:45 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 15:49 |
| Matej Knopp |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 15:49 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 15:56 |
| Vincent Demay |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 16:09 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 16:11 |
| Frédéric Bertin |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 16:12 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 16:14 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 16:18 |
| Vincent Demay |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 16:21 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 16:22 |
| Martijn Dashorst |
Re: Going from setVisible(false) to setVisible(true) does not work without surounding element |
Mon, 19 Mar, 16:25 |
| Igor Vaynberg |
Re: Wicket 1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT kitchensink release is available |
Mon, 19 Mar, 17:40 |