Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-wicket-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 189 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2007 19:06:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2007 19:06:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 46496 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2007 19:06:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-wicket-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 46479 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2007 19:06:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wicket-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 46468 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2007 19:06:16 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:06:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of eelco.hillenius@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:06:06 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so270027nfe for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:05:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aobij4MyMGtpE0WYiKGXF0QG+wUjSoI5Z3m/jX7InHUdR5sovRN86vZuxQS/cZ/K88taWTSPUWuYAZ+Nq3+mq45fHpz84pnXm9RFuEPHAoNg9hZnacUgr5J3uHop+bYzjhijwUW1X3bav7vPVNjdjtcskC8T/aKdO1TFi1PtoEw= Received: by 10.49.8.1 with SMTP id l1mr426667nfi.1170788745355; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.216.10 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:05:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:05:45 -0800 From: "Eelco Hillenius" To: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Single-page applications: bad idea in Wicket ? In-Reply-To: <23eb48360702061057q19bf1607i5bdce035c3571721@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8831903.post@talk.nabble.com> <23eb48360702061057q19bf1607i5bdce035c3571721@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > if there are problems with 2.0 supporting this then they should be > addressed, feel free to open jira issues. It's in 1.3 too (and yes, in fact it *is* potentially problematic for the app we're working on as well). And there is JIRA issue http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-201 (which refers to http://www.nabble.com/refactor-storing-pages-and-versions-tf2943670.html#a8231263). Eelco