Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-whirr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-whirr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 807D610602 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 133 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2013 19:39:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-whirr-dev-archive@whirr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99517 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2013 19:39:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@whirr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@whirr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@whirr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99210 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2013 19:39:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:39:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ferncam1@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.44] (HELO mail-pb0-f44.google.com) (209.85.160.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:38:59 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id wz12so1023723pbc.17 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:38:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=u2skDeT6JB4Mly+g1nmAV2Nep5MFguj3g8u2ijQAfCM=; b=B7RAulsLhEeJKuIIAWSengHME0gEUaUEXEf+IbZnz2XX8o7qlMfDVTfCCuwHCjvCKk GxDg39/YW9wzkrl7gQ8MJChjSEIj55q9VGGp/wpqFcp8lGe4IkZvmnrKgiidpa6ad0CL QOmvfGJsuedA1Vm79X/6nYoXtS1q5Y615YZIBqr98lGY1aRSRilrID6n7WCH1vElImpD SuVypEUp3s7THxMZpXjoRCYsuyoxYfo/4lPhpp2+C4N7uIrojWEmKY5TSO58HkzbQuWh 8RMqhj8yzT/PnfuDBy/8oRDyB1mRsrYBjjx4upwNq9qnx8rGQt3nbWFEbf28t3NW0vA8 mwdQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.48.201 with SMTP id o9mr11335792pan.196.1365709118459; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: ferncam1@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.0.196 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:38:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:38:38 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xJE_01vwEgZqWm-TSFXiXfdEJi8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 0.8.2 release shortly? From: Adrian Cole To: "dev@whirr.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec543086edf582504da1aee97 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec543086edf582504da1aee97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 note that you might consider bumping 0.8 to jclouds 1.5.10 which has some bugfixes. -A On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > So while I'd still like to get WHIRR-693 in before 0.8.2 goes out, it > doesn't look like that's coming any time soon, and I'd really like to get > 0.8.2 done within the next week. How would you all feel about an 0.8.2 RC > based on the current state of the branch? > > I'm also thinking that once jclouds 1.6.0 is out (within a week or two), we > move trunk (i.e., 0.9) to jclouds 1.6.0. There'll have to be a little > refactoring here and there, but nothing that major. > > A. > --bcaec543086edf582504da1aee97--