whirr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Change: RTC to CTR
Date Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:35:12 GMT
My .02 -- a core assumption of CTR is that people are actively
reviewing changes. The intent of CTR is not to reduce oversight.
That's an anti-pattern.

Patrick

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andrei Savu <savu.andrei@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I want to propose that we change from Review-Then-Commit to
> Commit-Then-Review
> for a while with the amendment that complicated changes still require code
> review.
>
> The main reason I am asking this is because over the last few weeks I have
> noticed
> a lack of engagement from the members of the core development team and this
> slows
> down things a lot. I am happy to see more and more people using Whirr and I
> think we
> should keep on developing things as fast as possible.
>
> We can go back to RTC later as soon as we have 3+ active committers.
>
> What do you think?
>
> -- Andrei Savu

Mime
View raw message