Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-whirr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-whirr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 308987ABE for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38547 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2011 15:48:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-whirr-dev-archive@whirr.apache.org Received: (qmail 38493 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2011 15:48:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@whirr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@whirr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@whirr.apache.org Received: (qmail 38371 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2011 15:48:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:48:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:48:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630D49DAE7 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:48:09 +0000 (UTC) From: "Adrian Cole (JIRA)" To: dev@whirr.apache.org Message-ID: <234709437.35079.1316188089402.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (WHIRR-371) Allow defining additional firewall rules MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13106538#comment-13106538 ] Adrian Cole commented on WHIRR-371: ----------------------------------- I don't find the whirr.firewall-rules-serviceA syntax intuitive compared to whirr.firewall-rules.serviceA It is possible we can commit a change to address this? > Allow defining additional firewall rules > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: WHIRR-371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-371 > Project: Whirr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core > Affects Versions: 0.6.0 > Reporter: Karel Vervaeke > Assignee: Karel Vervaeke > Fix For: 0.7.0 > > Attachments: WHIRR-371.patch, WHIRR-371.patch, WHIRR-371.patch, WHIRR-371.patch > > > Users should have more control over the firewall rules, by adding one or more properties to the whirr properties file -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira