whirr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adrian Cole <adr...@jclouds.org>
Subject Re: isolated runurl testing
Date Mon, 07 Feb 2011 06:01:45 GMT
Thanks.  I think I'll just do this as a part of WHIRR-124

-a

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Tom White <tom@cloudera.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Adrian Cole <adrian@jclouds.org> wrote:
> > Thanks, Tom.
> >
> > Is it possible to update all of the whirr runurl scripts that reference
> the
> > provider "ec2" to also accept "aws-ec2" ?  This will buy a little time,
> and
> > allow 124 to not have ugly hacks :)
>
> This sounds fine to me. Can you open a JIRA, or just do it as a part
> of WHIRR-124?
>
> >
> > -A
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Tom White <tom.e.white@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Adrian,
> >>
> >> This is a known problem, and I'd like to remove the default dependency
> >> on S3 for hosting scripts. There's a proposal on
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-225 for how to migrate
> >> away from this. Please let us know your thoughts!
> >>
> >> In the meantime, you can set the whirr.run-url-base property to point
> >> to another S3 bucket (or any webserver) to host a variant of the
> >> scripts for testing/customization.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Adrian Cole <adrian@jclouds.org>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi, guys.
> >> >
> >> > I'm sure that there's been discussion about this, but I wanted to call
> >> > attention to something.  Implementing WHIRR-124 was pretty tough due
> to
> >> > needing changes to runurl scripts.   In WHIRR-124, provider keys are
> now
> >> > different, and these are hard-coded in the runurl scripts.  I don't
> even
> >> > know where the version control is for these scripts.   I'd like to be
> >> able
> >> > to change my local copy of hadoop's post-configure and not have to
> worry
> >> > about who's using the public s3 bucket at the time, and I'd like to
> push
> >> > changes to runurl scripts as a part of a patch.
> >> >
> >> > How close are we to being able to isolate tests to only use files or
> code
> >> in
> >> > a local checkout of svn?
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > -Adrian
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message