velocity-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew (Tver)"...@etver.com>
Subject Re: Plans
Date Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:07:28 GMT
Hello Jason,

Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 12:54:08 PM, you wrote:

JvZ> A general question:

JvZ> Should we try and make Velocity a completely stand-alone replacement
JvZ> to WM, or can we say that we are planning a Turbine/Velocity
JvZ> partnership to be a replacement for WM. I prefer the partnership,
JvZ> Turbine has a huge development base compared to WM and it would
JvZ> be great to leverage that. I don't see why we can't pitch a
JvZ> Turbine/Velocity pair as a replacement/upgrade path for WM.


JvZ> Thanks,

JvZ> jvz.


I vote for stand-alone!

-- 
Best regards,
 Andrew                            mailto:a@etver.com



Mime
View raw message