velocity-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Bubna <>
Subject Re: Anakia in 2.0
Date Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:19:14 GMT
No.  We only use Maven for the website and the Maven-Ant tasks.
However, for the docs included in the release distribution, the "ant
docs" target still uses Anakia.  This Ant target either needs to be
updated to use a Maven-Ant task to do its work, or else to use the
independent Anakia.  If we want the docs in the release artifacts to
be identical to the website docs, then we should do the former.  If we
want to keep "eating our own dogfood", then we should do the latter.

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Byron Foster <> wrote:
> Ok, are we getting rid of ant and build.xml?
> On Feb 15, 2009, at 9:15 , Nathan Bubna wrote:
>> Hmm.  I thought Maven was doing all our site generation now, as it is
>> for velocity-site.  If so, then any ant docs target should probably
>> just be removed.  If, on the other hand, we are still using Anakia for
>> our site docs, then we should be switching it over to use the
>> independent Anakia project.  I tried to build the docs w/maven real
>> quick, but Maven seems unable to compile 2.x right now.  I'll try to
>> check on this again later if no one else gets to it.
>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Byron Foster <> wrote:
>>> The missing Anakia task in the 2.0 branch is causing the build to fail.
>>>  Is
>>> see that it was removed because it was deprecated.  Do we have an
>>> alternative way to generate the site docs?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message