velocity-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11924] - Add Support for Static Utility Classes
Date Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:45:44 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11924>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11924

Add Support for Static Utility Classes





------- Additional Comments From dlr@finemaltcoding.com  2002-08-22 19:45 -------
Geir, I'm totally in favor of that and have given my +1 on your vote.

I'm looking at this issue as a new feature, where one has only an instance of a
Class object and can't create an instance of the object it represents.  This
would be useful for some classes in the JDK which also have private constructors.

Combining my suggestion with Jim Seach's code above would produce a backwards
compatible solution for this issue.

Irregardless of what happens with this issue, I am firm on StringUtils having a
public ctor.  ;)

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:velocity-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:velocity-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message