unomi-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Ghen <>
Subject Re: Rule Evaluation Problem
Date Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:11:04 GMT
I think I may have figured out why this wasn't working after playing some

First, I went to just and "exists" comparisonOperator to simplify that.
Then, I added a profileUpdatedEventCondition to my condition. These two
conditions work and my action occured.

Second thing, I realize the lessThan and greaterThan must work backward to
how I expected it.

For example, consider properties.annualIncome = 4800. I expected that this
condition would be true:

          "parameterValues": {
            "propertyName": "properties.annualIncome",
            "comparisonOperator": "lessThan",
            "propertyValueInt": 12000
          "type": "profilePropertyCondition"

Really this must be: "12000 < properties.annualncomes == False"

When I switch to greaterThan, suddenly everything work: "12000 >
properties.annualIncomes == True"

So I had to do to things: 1) invert the comparisonOperator and 2) add a
subcondition for profileUpdatedEventCondition. Not sure why this worked but
it seems to work OK.

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 4:31 PM Michael Ghen <> wrote:

> Hello again,
> I am trying to get a proof of concept setup and I'm really struggling with
> how rules work. It seems that this simple rule is not being evaluated and
> I've tried a lot of combinations but still this won't perform as expected,
> I was hoping someone could just glance at the JSON I'm working with and let
> me know if there's something I'm missing.
> I have a rule and a profile attached and I don't understand why the rule
> work update the property on the profile as expected. I've tried to make
> updated to the annualIncome property thinking it would trigger the rule but
> that doesn't seem to work.
> I would like to provide more docs to this project but I can't seem to
> figure any of the features beyond updating profiles out enough to document
> them.
> Please let me know what you think of this profile and rule, I expected the
> eligibility property to be set to "yes" for the profile.

View raw message