From user-return-7885-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@uima.apache.org Wed Mar 21 19:07:20 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C6509180651 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:07:19 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 64394 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2018 18:07:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 64374 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2018 18:07:18 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) (207.244.88.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:07:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.41] (unknown [177.138.103.155]) by mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 20C2C52D; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Pipeline Performance Measurment (equivlent to RUTA annotation tests) From: Richard Eckart de Castilho In-Reply-To: <20180320205058.67gs53ujnu573a7w@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:07:13 -0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <80FCD2C1-D0A0-43D9-85DE-A0E035D82BC6@apache.org> References: <20180317193130.rh3imm4srldobaru@gmail.com> <20180320205058.67gs53ujnu573a7w@gmail.com> To: user@uima.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) On 20.03.2018, at 17:50, Nicolas Paris wrote: > > If so, I would be glad to share the result because while "easy" to > write, this kind of program should be packaged into UIMA core I guess. While it is easy to write such a program for a given type system, it is actually not so trivial to generically compare CASes to each other. UIMA 3 contains some comparison code which makes specific assumptions (search for CasCompare) and for WebAnno, I also wrote a "CasDiff2" which makes quite a number of assumptions on the type system design. I guess Peter also has this AnnotationComparator and I assume it also is based on specific assumptions. If you have a generic solution at hand, that would be quite interesting. Cheers, -- Richard