uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com>
Subject Re: Parameters for PEAR
Date Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:31:34 GMT
Ok, I opened an issue for this.


Peter


Am 12.02.2018 um 17:46 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> nope. sorry. -Marshall
>
>
> On 2/9/2018 3:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> did you get an answer?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 10.01.2018 um 17:12 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> I'm pinging some people who might know something about LanguageWare's use of
>>> this feature. -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/10/2018 6:07 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 10.01.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
>>>>>> On 16.12.2017, at 13:48, Peter Klügl <peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it a problem for us to simply implement Matthias's solution:
Make use
>>>>>>> of the parameters in the PearSpecifier and just set them in the
wrapped
>>>>>>> analysis engine description if they are compatible?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are there any opinions on this?
>>>>> First, I was a bit confused and though the "PearSpecifier" would be
>>>>> this guy here [1]. The I realized it is this one [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking at where the parameters of the PearSpecifier are used: apparently
the
>>>>> setParameter and getParameter are only ever called directly in unit tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it mean that the frameworks so far does not make any use of these
parameter
>>>>> as all? Or maybe they are used via some inherited methods...?
>>>>>
>>>>> It sounds reasonable to me that these parameters are forwarded to the
top-level
>>>>> component in the PEAR - the question I am asking myself is though: why
doesn't
>>>>> this already happen and (maybe) what else where these PearSpecifier parameters
>>>>> intended to do then?
>>>> Yes, these are exactly the questions we had :-)
>>>>
>>>> I rather wanted to ask twice before I open an issue or implement
>>>> something. Could always be that I missed something. Initially, I thought
>>>> that the IBM guys (LanguageWare) made massive use of the PEAR concept
>>>> and they surely had some possibility to configure their PEARs.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Richard
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-current/references.html#ugr.ref.pear.installation_descriptor
>>>>> [2] http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-current/references.html#ugr.ref.pear.specifier

-- 
Peter Klügl
R&D Text Mining/Machine Learning

Averbis GmbH
Tennenbacher Str. 11
79106 Freiburg
Germany

Fon: +49 761 708 394 0
Fax: +49 761 708 394 10
Email: peter.kluegl@averbis.com
Web: https://averbis.com

Headquarters: Freiburg im Breisgau
Register Court: Amtsgericht Freiburg im Breisgau, HRB 701080
Managing Directors: Dr. med. Philipp Daumke, Dr. Kornél Markó


Mime
View raw message