Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: Re: UIMA Ruta use of features in a block statement
To: user@uima.apache.org
References: <2146449917.2945085.1496151331791.JavaMail.zimbra@scai.fraunhofer.de>
 <1dec92a8-13a0-beb4-bc30-3f056227d693@averbis.com>
 <1928343073.2947554.1496155059954.JavaMail.zimbra@scai.fraunhofer.de>
 <eeb44e5c-fe00-ad76-7553-de0cf0858a68@gmail.com>
 <2baef45a-0269-af9a-6fb1-48f8af8d992f@scai.fraunhofer.de>
 <b911a044-d96f-2f12-f3ee-4201fe1b7fbe@averbis.com>
 <589e4bad-cec6-e344-f12f-bff84a16f0fa@scai.fraunhofer.de>
 <2ef61ddd-a843-aa4c-0ff5-7bef2f2b3319@scai.fraunhofer.de>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_Kl=c3=bcgl?= <peter.kluegl@averbis.com>
Message-ID: <7bf633b3-50e4-44d4-2e69-a7aa296e0701@averbis.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 18:00:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2ef61ddd-a843-aa4c-0ff5-7bef2f2b3319@scai.fraunhofer.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
archived-at: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 16:00:52 -0000

Hi,


I cannot reproduce the problem. So you have maybe a small runnable test?


Best,


Peter


Am 31.05.2017 um 14:18 schrieb Sumit Madan:
> Am 31.05.2017 um 13:26 schrieb Sumit Madan:
>> Am 31.05.2017 um 09:59 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>>> Am 30.05.2017 um 19:35 schrieb Sumit Madan:
>>>> We were not able to access the annotation within the BLOCK.
>>>>
>>>> ###
>>>> STRING s;
>>>> BOOLEAN a ;
>>>>
>>>> // This is not working for us:
>>>> BLOCK(forEACH) Lemma{}{
>>>>      Lemma{->MATCHEDTEXT(s), ASSIGN(a,contains(s,"er"))};
>>>>      Lemma{a ->Test1};
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> // This is working:
>>>> BLOCK(forEACH) Lemma{}{
>>>>      W{->MATCHEDTEXT(s), ASSIGN(a,contains(s,"er"))};
>>>>      W{a ->Test2};
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> // This is also working:
>>>> BLOCK(forEACH) Lemma{}{
>>>> Document{->MATCHEDTEXT(s), ASSIGN(a,contains(s,"er"))};
>>>> Document{a ->Test3};
>>>> }
>>>> ###
>>>>
>>> All three examples should work. Which ruta version do you use? It looks
>>> like a bug.
>>
>> Lisa is testing again and will get back to you.
>
> We tested it again and can confirm the following:
>
> ###
> STRING s;
> BOOLEAN a ;
>
> // This is not working:
> BLOCK(forEACH1) Lemma{} { // Matches a lot
>      Lemma{->MATCHEDTEXT(s), ASSIGN(a,contains(s,"er"))}; // Matches 0
>      Lemma{a ->Test1};
> }
>
> // This is not working:
> BLOCK(forEACH2) Lemma{} { // Matches a lot
> Lemma{contains(Lemma.ct, "er") -> MARK(Test2)}; // Matches 0
> }
>
> // This is working:
> Lemma{contains(Lemma.ct, "er") -> MARK(Test3)}; // Matches 1
>
> // This is working:
> BLOCK(forEACH4) Lemma{}{
>      W{->MATCHEDTEXT(s), ASSIGN(a,contains(s,"er"))}; // Matches 1
>      W{a ->Test4};
> }
>
> // This is also working:
> BLOCK(forEACH5) Lemma{}{
>     Document{->MATCHEDTEXT(s), ASSIGN(a,contains(s,"er"))}; // Matches 1
>     Document{a ->Test5};
> }
> ###
>
> Is it possible that in a BLOCK only Ruta types are available?
>
> We are using the latest stable version 2.6.0.
>