Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Message-Id: <021cdb$5i1nv0@ironport10.mayo.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:39:40 +0000
From: "Murphy, Sean P." <Murphy.Sean@mayo.edu>
Subject: RE: Annotation Index not recognized with Linux
In-reply-to: 
 <38DD5510DD255845934ABD523985843B9D2217C9@MSGPEXCEI11A.mfad.mfroot.org>
To: "'user@uima.apache.org'" <user@uima.apache.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary=_000_38DD5510DD255845934ABD523985843B9D2223A9MSGPEXCEI11Amfa_
Content-language: en-US
Accept-Language: en-US
Thread-topic: Annotation Index not recognized with Linux
Thread-index: AdJs55fIiywUCJrtSsmSDD6qH3SiigAyuCaw
Old-x-esetresult: clean, is OK
Old-x-esetid: D00A7A3EC3353032824A22
References: 
 <38DD5510DD255845934ABD523985843B9D2217C9@MSGPEXCEI11A.mfad.mfroot.org>
archived-at: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:40:12 -0000

--_000_38DD5510DD255845934ABD523985843B9D2223A9MSGPEXCEI11Amfa_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello again.  I'm sorry if I'm being a bit persistent.  I just see this fal=
ling out of view once the weekend arrives.  Let know if there is some addit=
ional information I can provide that may offer additional insights or if th=
ere is another forum with which I should be addressing this question.
                Thanks,
                                ~Sean

From: Murphy, Sean P. [RO IS]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:22 AM
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: Annotation Index not recognized with Linux

Hello,
I am seeing some behavior that appears to be specific to our Jenkins build =
environment where the base annotation (uima.tcas.Annotation) is not being s=
orted correctly.   The expected behavior, where tokens are sorted in an asc=
ending order based on the begin token integer, is occurring on any other pl=
atform (iOS or Windows).    I attempted to circumvent this behavior by util=
izing the Indexes Page to add an additional index which uses OHNLP's  Conce=
ptMention as 'kind' 'sorted' and features similar to the built in index pro=
vided, but that did not have the intended result either.
                To establish if the added index had any effect I went on to=
 use reverse sort direction on the ConceptMention annotation, but it didn't=
 appear to take effect in any environment which leads me to believe I'm not=
 utilizing it correctly.    I'm wondering if the additional index needs to =
be made on a primitive aggregate rather than at the AE level as I'm attempt=
ing.    It is not clear by the documentation whether the getAnnotationIndex=
() method has access to the sorted index of if another method (such as FSIn=
dexRepository) would be necessary to produce the iterator which honors the =
indexing.  I've tried both with no apparent effect.
                So I guess I'm asking two different questions:

1)      Are there issues with Linux utilizing the built in index annotation=
?

2)      How does one go about implementing the indexes pages to provide a c=
ustom handling of sorting indexes?
Thanks,
                        ~Sean


--_000_38DD5510DD255845934ABD523985843B9D2223A9MSGPEXCEI11Amfa_--