Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B93018E42 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38017 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2015 18:28:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 37973 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2015 18:28:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 37962 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2015 18:28:32 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:28:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 088CDC0419 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:28:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76qR12ESTbS8 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.10]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0D13C439E9 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.5] ([46.223.1.89]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcxSS-1aRhQc1bw8-00iBY9 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 20:28:22 +0200 Subject: Re: Support for UIMA arrays in Ruta To: user@uima.apache.org References: <3959E561-1BAD-4973-A695-EFB298CF905E@gmail.com> <56140068.8070007@averbis.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_Kl=c3=bcgl?= Message-ID: <561412C3.4000808@averbis.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 20:28:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4Na9rcc2OkE8qEiCgnj+uqza1VrztdnUQ3Gl+pwH3kwmkMN32+i 2jputwXSv5fZIE810WqHfHa3Xbx+I1K0ibjj0elpmxrOs8cgU2pxG+30AKITa304MBrKVyH 5EeS6C7vUuEWBS6yGElHv4cMiP8616dKaI0A+WdsLOM1P2DwZWKS/g8zyXGNMB7X0E0nbd7 BSRskNMf2IhWpK5W8s8Cg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:x3m7XXzoB2U=:4CzMVUmq/1iYBMwiPB0SQL XnpTGXI5LbOXVljaSSVIhHfY1l2P258QmgmPsfCmo2mr0Z00XNC9lLVeIOOXJdrHqlqZh5vp4 3IzQqLuBP413MbPYNxF/RFJmIWgJCEhlScJ6McHIhETqEoYDA4xv0Ym8F+fbDsB/Oj2cB2+TM eM/RMoQptsEFmGTIQXyofnT2xLYJP88MMAbD/LAT9X798Km0U9Yn2iX8wixE+XgHFIzc/9Bgo nd8G2PR5pWEeyJD8WbgnKBAR0T9UNaTtEfew9cqfT1GbsA1kXVx0Fjj9zg2FNj84Gz4hgtJaz HTNWHiBQzeQvjeTflOm8X9Wlx7ErNiXNLw60rVPq08ZINlwVhxCVDRT441XvlbFD1zkceCm49 lD4Ixub+/R/XWW+sotUI3PByST0WNXwecfoX1m18fbYupfz5ajK7RDxt9mAIj3tpdsXfCfmUH /yIqoJg6BDgBtwoIh9AS3uxdphWTZLySyf2lmFsAGeVN/KDz/WEFYTUC+EO+J4iVlFvOYHJks 99sBhm/bJQcx05GcCR4xw25TbdOzqwpK2Ki0G4V/u+SsWXuhLNXSf/6xatgkPrTZTULrW6BzZ wODBIVSIEgMks8hmemG/LT2IXzXJiZubJF98qLfTaFE5O27vulD16DT7h2JAkyuxbOxhpnDec UpbChWffLYAjThsWn9t1UlMNODM4yfI8ZywOYHyosUe40jzwE5D6k9TCrL2zHdjPLvP4d1FRi YKzDAOwguMBOvbzG The most important actions are CREATE and GATHER. There are also some others like FILL or SETFEATURE. The ASSIGN action works only for variables. Best, Peter Am 06.10.2015 um 19:47 schrieb Mario Gazzo: > That’s completely understandable, Peter. > > FSArray assignment might just do it for me at the moment. Could you point me to the special actions you are mentioning? Is it the Assign action? > > Cheers > Mario > >> On 06 Oct 2015, at 19:10 , Peter Klügl wrote: >> >> Hi Mario, >> >> yes, sadly, it's true. Only the assignments to FSArrays using special actions is supported right now. >> >> I did not find the time to implement it for 2.3.0 or 2.3.1, but I really hope I can do it for 2.4.0. >> >> Any help is welcome :-) >> >> (however, I must admit that this is trickier and more work than it looks like) >> >> Best, >> >> Peter >> >> Am 06.10.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Mario Gazzo: >>> Hej Peter, >>> >>> Does Ruta still not support UIMA arrays in version 2.3? >>> >>> Found this post from May this year that says it isn’t supported in version 2.2.1: >>> >>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/uima-user/201505.mbox/%3C5558A074.9090405@averbis.com%3E >>> >>> Couldn’t find anything about it in the latest Ruta docs either. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Mario