Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Subject: Re: UIMA Ruta doesn't detect previous annotations
From: Manuel Ciosici <manuel.ciosici@unsilo.com>
In-Reply-To: <55C35DD4.9020009@averbis.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:31:59 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E5618AF9-A0FE-4D13-8B1F-F984E6FEE014@unsilo.com>
References: <0C41FD56-D8FB-483C-BB61-180624961E43@unsilo.com>
 <55C35DD4.9020009@averbis.com>
To: user@uima.apache.org

Hello Peter,

Sorry for the late reply. Thank you very much, your suggestion fixed my =
issue.

Manuel

> On 06 Aug 2015, at 15:15 , Peter Kl=C3=BCgl <peter.kluegl@averbis.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> yes this is the right place.
>=20
> First quick guess: filtering settings.
>=20
> Do your annotations starts with something invisible like MARKUP, SPACE
> or BREAK?
>=20
> You can test it by adding a rule like the following before the others
> are applied.
>=20
> Document{-> RETAINTYPE(WS, BREAK, MARKUP)};
>=20
> or with ruta 2.3.0, only:
>=20
> RETAINTYPE(WS, BREAK, MARKUP);
>=20
> Best,
>=20
> Peter
>=20
>=20
> Am 06.08.2015 um 15:05 schrieb Manuel Ciosici:
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> I hope this is the right place to ask about using UIMA Ruta.=20
>>=20
>> I am trying to integrate Ruta in an UIMA pipeline after an AE and add =
some annotations based on the ones added by the previous AE. Currently, =
my Ruta script doesn=E2=80=99t seem to be able to pick up those =
previously existing annotations. I have saved the output from the =
previous AE in an XMI file and I=E2=80=99m testing using the Eclipse =
workbench.
>>=20
>> I can see the annotations from the previous AE in the Annotation =
Browser View, so they are there, but when I look in the Applied Rules =
view, Ruta never attempts to apply the rule (shows 0/0 for attempts). =
I=E2=80=99ve tried creating some of the same annotations from my Ruta =
script and these are seen by my other Ruta rules. I have also played =
around with various ways of importing the types using TYPESYSTEM and =
IMPORT, but to no effect.
>>=20
>> Here=E2=80=99s a sample script exhibiting this behaviour:
>>=20
>> PACKAGE com.unsilo.ruta_test;
>> TYPESYSTEM com.unsilo.cproc.types.TestAnnotations;
>>=20
>> XMLTagAnnotation.tagName =3D=3D "Book" { -> XMLTagAnnotation.tagName =
=3D "BookPublisher=E2=80=9D};
>>=20
>>=20
>> The TestAnnotations XML file is located in the descriptor folder =
under the path com/unsilo/cproc/types/TestAnnotations.xml.
>>=20
>> Thank you,
>> Manuel
>=20