uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com>
Subject Re: Problem with matching of composite rules
Date Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:46:09 GMT

Am 10.07.2015 um 13:55 schrieb Andreas Weber:
> Peter Klügl <pkluegl@...> writes:
>> ... in the light of current events and since you use it integrated in
>> your software:
>> Did you use an analysis engine for creating the CAS or, in case you
>> created it using a type system, did you consider the type priotities?
> Hi Peter,
> thanks for your help.
> We create our CAS and annotations programmatically using our own type
> system, we don't use another UIMA annotator.
> I played a little bit around with type priorities (MY_ANNO > W)  but that
> had no impact. The main problem seems to be that we have the _same_
> annotation type at one input position.

That shouldnt't be a problem at all ;-)

UIMA Ruta brings its own type priorities for some special internal 
types. If the priorities are missing then there could be some problems 
in sequential matching.

I'll take a look at it.



> Regards,
>   Andreas

View raw message