uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com>
Subject Re: Marking cosnecutive tokens with RUTA
Date Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:19:26 GMT
After the changes of the last mail, the jar cotnains everything, when
- I change the phase of the ruta-maven-plugin to process-resources
- I set the outputDirectory for type system and analysis engine
directly  to target classes



Am 25.06.2015 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> Some first observations...
> You should:
> - remove all paths configs in your pom for the ruta-maven-plugin:
> scriptPaths, descriptorPaths, resourcePaths
> - remove the TypeSystem.xml file in the script folder
> - remove build-helper-maven-plugin
> Now the generated descriptors should be correctly configured. However,
> they are not part of the jar, but only of the sources jar. There is
> something special about your maven build process which I haven't found
> yet...
> Best,
> Peter
> Am 23.06.2015 um 19:41 schrieb Diego Buoro:
>> Hello Peter,
>> We would like to know how to configurate the line with the "import
>> location" below, of MainTypeSystem.xml(which is genarated by the Ruta
>> plugin by Maven), since in our present state, it is referecing to a file in
>> two layers above of the desired. We searched in pom.xml,but we had no
>> success.
>> <typeSystemDescription xmlns="http://uima.apache.org/resourceSpecifier">
>>     <name>MainTypeSystem</name>
>>     <imports>
>>        * <import location="../../../../../../descriptor/TypeSystem.xml"/>*
>>     </imports>
>> ...
>> No problem Peter, take your time.Thanks to you, we did a good progress :)
>> All Best,
>> Diego
>> 2015-06-22 10:28 GMT-03:00 Peter Klügl <peter.kluegl@averbis.com>:
>>> Hi,
>>> I haven't checked all files in your project, but (without looking at it
>>> right now) there are several TypeSystem.xml files.
>>> If they are the same files (content), then I would recommend to have
>>> only one of these files, e.g., in the descriptor folder. If these files
>>> are different type systems, then I would recommend to give them a
>>> different name.
>>> You do not need to change anything if all works as expected.
>>> I am a bit busy right now so that I can't give a more detailed advice
>>> before the end of this week.
>>> Best,
>>> Peter
>>> Am 19.06.2015 um 21:31 schrieb Diego Buoro:
>>>> Hi again, we managed to fix our problem with the features. Our main worry
>>>> at the moment is: the problems that you mentioned about having duplicated
>>>> type systems all over the place are still there. Can you recommend some
>>>> reference that you think would be apropriate for fixing this in our
>>>> project? If not, can you be a bit clearer on what you suggest we should
>>> do?
>>>> All Best,
>>>> Diego
>>>> 2015-06-19 15:55 GMT-03:00 Diego Buoro <jklports@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Hello, Peter, thanks for the suggestion as always :D
>>>>> Unfortunately, our problems weren't solved. We tried removing all paths
>>>>> from the configuration and we tried setting those paths as in the
>>> example
>>>>> project.In both cases we were eventually able to get the program
>>> running,
>>>>> but we were unable to import features from ruta annotations into java.
>>> We
>>>>> Don't know if that happened because of some problem in the configuration
>>>>> itself or in the code (which seemed to be working before these
>>>>> configuration problems started). Do you have any ideas?
>>>>> All Best,
>>>>> Diego

View raw message