Return-Path: 
 <user-return-6327-apmail-uima-user-archive=uima.apache.org@uima.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20DDF10FC9
	for <apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:18:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 66487 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2015 15:18:30 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66447 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2015 15:18:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@uima.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@uima.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@uima.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.uima.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org
Delivered-To: moderator for user@uima.apache.org
Received: (qmail 49196 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2015 11:51:36 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 albertogarcia.garcia@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=NfDPgOLsKQmhzXacdNQe/p5CS9eqB+RUzkEUZqjTM0U=;
        b=nwfstMl5IF6Zao2vbLJ2N/6q6ydvXIMpIxcfWOPqogzJE/aEuLc5qkvbVqLQK/Tnw4
         PZhmpHmsTru+xULQdqoDjH8HQlEvxmNN5U1XFNI0/5vOVQPTrKpJxV2/7Vu/Hn/N49RP
         OSE3sdli1BowX7gAXhI08ZVectdsoNE2NVB2VxOqfM0/q1CoSu8x2G+qNWEWhUZR+Daq
         NsB4V3k5lYZV0SoBVXLjY2DnJfg+QMgn24Y983s9xZKpRvz153rtilXpRMRIp9hxgsVJ
         Or5OJ0MVYJJHtfW4iguEjVQYONUEA0uNzWnDn9Yum5HTMwg3bfXEYcHHLyiIlVXpH20Q
         ue5Q==
X-Received: by 10.152.121.66 with SMTP id li2mr3740773lab.40.1424346670427;
 Thu, 19 Feb 2015 03:51:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Alberto Garcia <albertogarcia.garcia@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:50:50 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CADDEBKQ5_NNxkHxMP=qK3bPa-sruQ74PP63+ZTESEATKD_0paQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Concept Mapper Annotator Question
To: user@uima.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0112c88653f619050f6f8d16
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--089e0112c88653f619050f6f8d16
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We are starting to use UIMA framework for entity identification. We base
our solution on some dictionaries which contains the entities we need to
recognize.

We are using the Concept Mapper annotator, and it works really fast
recognizing the complete name of an entity, but it fails recognizing part
of the entity, let me explain that with an example,

Lets say we have this entry on the dictionary:



<token canonical=3D*"Location"* DOCNO=3D*"10000"*>

    <variant base =3D *"New York City"*/>

</token>



If we call the service with =E2=80=9C*New York City=E2=80=9D *as input text=
  it recognize
the entity as Location,

If we call the service with =E2=80=9C*New City York=E2=80=9D *or different =
permutations it
recognize the entity as Location,

BUT If we call the service with =E2=80=9C*New City=E2=80=9D*  it does not r=
ecognize it as a
Location.



Can anyone tell me how I can implement or configure this behavior for the
Concept Annotator?

--089e0112c88653f619050f6f8d16--