uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From José Tomás Atria <jtat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Selecting all connected annotations by type.
Date Sat, 31 Jan 2015 04:38:22 GMT
Please disregard the previous patch, apparently I managed to corrupt it
while creating it over ssh.

The version in this email should be correct, I hope.

Best,
jta

On Fri Jan 30 2015 at 11:09:10 PM José Tomás Atria <jtatria@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Richard:
>
> I am attaching a patch with a series of selectIntersects and
> indexIntersects methods. There's more signatures than the corresponding
> selectCovered/Covering methods, as "intersects" could include covering
> annotations or not. If they are excluded, the methods use the same approach
> you used in selecCovered, advancing the iterator. Otherwise, they defer to
> the int interval method used in selectCovering.
>
> Maybe this is useful to someone else besides myself?
>
> Also, I have no experience with unit testing, so I didn't even try adding
> to add tests for the new methods. I did some naive testing by hand, and it
> seems to work... but I'm particularly bad with interval operations, so I
> wouldn't be surprised if I made some egregious error. My apologies in
> advance.
>
> Best,
> jta
>
>
> On Mon Jan 26 2015 at 3:19:37 PM José Tomás Atria <jtatria@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Cool, I'll look into ti and let you know if I manage to make something
>> useful. Thanks for the tips.
>>
>> On Sun Jan 25 2015 at 12:47:52 PM Richard Eckart de Castilho <
>> rec@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi José,
>>>
>>> we had no need for such a method so far ;) The easiest way would
>>> probably be to copy the
>>> selectCovering method from uimaFIT and adjust it to catch all
>>> intersecting annotations.
>>> You can probably add an optimization to a selectIntersecting method
>>> which breaks the loop as soon as the begin offset of an annotation is
>>> larger than the end offset of your intersection range.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> -- Richard
>>>
>>> On 24.01.2015, at 22:25, José Tomás Atria <jtatria@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello all,
>>> >
>>> > I am looking for the best approach to select all annotations of a given
>>> > type that intersect an annotation of a different type.
>>> >
>>> > I am aware of selectCovered and selectCovering, which, as far as I
>>> > understand, will select all annotations (of a given type) that cover
>>> ranges
>>> > of text which are, respectively, subsets or supersets of another
>>> > annotation. Is there a similar method for annotations that cover ranges
>>> > which merely _intersect_ with the range covered by a given annotation?
>>> >
>>> > What would the recommended way of achieving this?
>>> >
>>> > Any help would be apreciated. Thanks!
>>> > jta.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
>>>
>>>

Mime
View raw message