Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <547F220D.7070301@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:45:33 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ZXIgS2zDvGds?= <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ruta additional extensions
References: 
 <CA+gF1kWU_M7ZJ0Y8dw=0pJfWaVUO_3QAjy4NFVGH+-L8SY1wZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <547DB3B0.4010209@uni-wuerzburg.de>
 <CA+gF1kVeSZNg_AiQdas=NNNzn=Mb2uxaunxVu1Dqo7g=xtGf2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <547DD9A3.4020401@uni-wuerzburg.de>
 <CA+gF1kXVB3FWNAUxCZ1isB+qGBkFZqBq4KW95obC7Ftzpw_XHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <547DE17C.1050004@uni-wuerzburg.de> <547F1797.9070603@uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <547F1797.9070603@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Am 03.12.2014 15:00, schrieb Peter Klügl:
> Unfortunately, the builder overrides the extensions with the provided
> ones in the workbench.
>
> I can change this if you want. However, it would also be reasonable to
> investigate why the extension is not added anyway...

Was just a minimal change. If you work on the current trunk, you can
give it a try.

Best,

Peter


> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> Am 02.12.2014 16:57, schrieb Peter Klügl:
>> Hmmm, I have to check it (tomorrow) ...
>>
>> Am 02.12.2014 16:53, schrieb Silvestre Losada:
>>> I have it in descriptor folder however ruta workbench is not using that
>>> file. would it be possible that ruta workbench has another one?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On 2 December 2014 at 16:24, Peter Klügl <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> should be in the descriptor folder of the ruta project
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> Am 02.12.2014 16:03, schrieb Silvestre Losada:
>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you tell me where is located BasicEngine.xml templated?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2 December 2014 at 13:42, Peter Klügl <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there are two types of extension, one for the analysis engine and one
>>>>>> for the workbench.
>>>>>> The second takes care that the descriptor contain references to the
>>>>>> first one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Provides the editor syntax highlighting for your new action?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have a plugin in the workbench that provides an Eclipse extension
>>>>>> for the extension point org.apache.uima.ruta.ide.actionExtension?
>>>>>> I wonder why the extension is part of the classpath at all if the
>>>>>> configuration parameters are not updated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The descriptors are replaced when the script file is saved. There is no
>>>>>> direct way to avoid the overwriting. If you do not want to take care of
>>>>>> the Workbench stuff at all, you could probably also just add the
>>>>>> extension to the BasicEngine.xml (it's the template for the descriptors)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 02.12.2014 13:15, schrieb Silvestre Losada:
>>>>>>> I created new UIMA action using the languages extension
>>>>>>> <
>>>> https://uima.apache.org/d/ruta-current/tools.ruta.book.html#ugr.tools.ruta.language.extensions
>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>> In file descriptor generated by ruta workbench I had to added to
>>>>>>> configuration parameters in additiionalExtensions section. The
>>>> extension
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> working properly, however ruta workbench overwrites the file descriptor
>>>>>>> sometimes and I loose that configuration.  Is there any way to
>>>> configure
>>>>>>> Ruta workbench to avoid overwriting the file descriptor?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>>>