uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Silvestre Losada <silvestre.los...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Ruta additional extensions
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:53:19 GMT
I have it in descriptor folder however ruta workbench is not using that
file. would it be possible that ruta workbench has another one?


Regards

On 2 December 2014 at 16:24, Peter Klügl <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:

> should be in the descriptor folder of the ruta project
>
> Peter
>
> Am 02.12.2014 16:03, schrieb Silvestre Losada:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Could you tell me where is located BasicEngine.xml templated?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > On 2 December 2014 at 13:42, Peter Klügl <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> there are two types of extension, one for the analysis engine and one
> >> for the workbench.
> >> The second takes care that the descriptor contain references to the
> >> first one.
> >>
> >> Provides the editor syntax highlighting for your new action?
> >>
> >> Do you have a plugin in the workbench that provides an Eclipse extension
> >> for the extension point org.apache.uima.ruta.ide.actionExtension?
> >> I wonder why the extension is part of the classpath at all if the
> >> configuration parameters are not updated.
> >>
> >> The descriptors are replaced when the script file is saved. There is no
> >> direct way to avoid the overwriting. If you do not want to take care of
> >> the Workbench stuff at all, you could probably also just add the
> >> extension to the BasicEngine.xml (it's the template for the descriptors)
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 02.12.2014 13:15, schrieb Silvestre Losada:
> >>> I created new UIMA action using the languages extension
> >>> <
> >>
> https://uima.apache.org/d/ruta-current/tools.ruta.book.html#ugr.tools.ruta.language.extensions
> >>> ,
> >>> In file descriptor generated by ruta workbench I had to added to
> >>> configuration parameters in additiionalExtensions section. The
> extension
> >> is
> >>> working properly, however ruta workbench overwrites the file descriptor
> >>> sometimes and I loose that configuration.  Is there any way to
> configure
> >>> Ruta workbench to avoid overwriting the file descriptor?
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message