uima-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Silvestre Losada <silvestre.los...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Ruta additional extensions
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:03:00 GMT
Hi Peter,

Could you tell me where is located BasicEngine.xml templated?

Thanks in advance.

On 2 December 2014 at 13:42, Peter Kl├╝gl <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> there are two types of extension, one for the analysis engine and one
> for the workbench.
> The second takes care that the descriptor contain references to the
> first one.
>
> Provides the editor syntax highlighting for your new action?
>
> Do you have a plugin in the workbench that provides an Eclipse extension
> for the extension point org.apache.uima.ruta.ide.actionExtension?
> I wonder why the extension is part of the classpath at all if the
> configuration parameters are not updated.
>
> The descriptors are replaced when the script file is saved. There is no
> direct way to avoid the overwriting. If you do not want to take care of
> the Workbench stuff at all, you could probably also just add the
> extension to the BasicEngine.xml (it's the template for the descriptors)
>
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> Am 02.12.2014 13:15, schrieb Silvestre Losada:
> > I created new UIMA action using the languages extension
> > <
> https://uima.apache.org/d/ruta-current/tools.ruta.book.html#ugr.tools.ruta.language.extensions
> >,
> > In file descriptor generated by ruta workbench I had to added to
> > configuration parameters in additiionalExtensions section. The extension
> is
> > working properly, however ruta workbench overwrites the file descriptor
> > sometimes and I loose that configuration.  Is there any way to configure
> > Ruta workbench to avoid overwriting the file descriptor?
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message